Whitman news since 1896

Whitman Wire

Vol. CLIV, Issue 10
Whitman news since 1896

Whitman Wire

Whitman news since 1896

Whitman Wire

Al-Awlaki assassinated; no due process of law

This column was written by Seth Dawson, senior politics and philosophy major.

The Obama Administration has decided that it has the authority to kill citizens at its discretion, ignoring any and all Constitutional rights that get in the way. Last month, the government assassinated two American citizens in Yemen with no due process, no trial, no charges and no legal justification. The deaths of Anwar al-Awlaki and Samir Khan were hailed by the President as another significant milestone in the broader effort to defeat al Qaeda and its affiliates, but it would have been more accurate to call it a milestone on the road to authoritarianism.

As citizens, we are supposed to be protected by the due process of law.  The Fifth Amendment guarantees that the government will respect people’s rights when it decides to prosecute, fine, incarcerate or kill them for a crime. Despite their ties to al Qaeda, al-Awlaki and Khan had the same rights as every other citizen. They had the right to be informed of their crime. They had the right to a trial by jury. They had the right to face their accusers and the right to legal representation. The Obama Administration decided to skip all those minor Constitutional hurdles – trials can be so annoying sometimes – and jump straight to the execution.

Now, in the aftermath of two unconstitutional assassinations, the Administration is refusing to tell us what evidence it used to justify killing these citizens. White House spokesman Jay Carney assured the press that the Administration would only target citizens who threaten the nation, but revealed nothing about how it would determine who is a threat. Last week, Reuters reported that “American militants like Anwar al-Awlaki are placed on a kill or capture list by a secretive panel of senior government officials, which then informs the president of its decisions . . . There is no public record of the operations or decisions of the panel . . . Neither is there any law establishing its existence or setting out the rules by which it is supposed to operate.” Apparently we all owe an apology to Sarah Palin; Obama does have a death panel after all.

Of course, this death panel is far more sinister than the ones Palin suggested were hiding in the Affordable Care Act. It has been empowered to decide which citizens are entitled to their Constitutional rights and which citizens are unprotected threats. It can determine who has the right to due process, the right to a trial by jury and the right to be free from cruel and unusual punishments on whatever grounds it sees fit. Because it has no public record and is governed by no laws, this panel never has to reveal the standard of evidence it uses to make its decisions. What does it take to earn a spot on that kill list? How much evidence is enough to prove that a citizen is a threat worthy of assassination? We the People have no idea. The Obama Administration refuses to tell us.

The key to our government is the separation of powers. There are checks and balances, designed to keep any one branch from gaining too much power over the people. Through these assassinations, the Obama Administration is subverting this separation, setting the precedent that American citizens can be imprisoned and killed at the discretion of an unchecked, ungoverned executive panel. The only way to fight against this authoritarian power is to check it with the power of another branch of government. I urge you to call your Senators and Representatives and ask how they intend to protect your rights. The number for the Congressional switchboard is (202) 224-3121.

View Comments (5)
More to Discover

Comments (5)

All Whitman Wire Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • M

    MikeNov 8, 2011 at 7:46 am

    @ Sgt of Marines

    All of these facts that you speak of is what should have been brought up in a court of law. We decide whether or not people committed capital crime through a jury, not by one guy who happened to get 51% of the popular vote. Not only is this a terrible precedent to set, but it is also in clear violation of the 1st, 5th, and 14th ammendments, as well as section 3, article on of the constitution (through destruction of judicial authority). It doesn’t matter how much YOU think he’s guilty, what matters is whether a jury thinks he’s guilty, which we can now never know.

    Reply
  • S

    Seth DawsonOct 15, 2011 at 1:36 pm

    @Sgt of Marines,

    The question of whether al-Awlaki deserved to die is separate from the question of whether the government has the authority to assassinate citizens without due process. My column is about the latter, and my answer will always be “No.” No matter how grievous al-Awlaki’s crimes, no matter how un-American they may have been, the government is bound by the Constitution to respect his rights.

    As for my “internal political beliefs and agenda,” you might be interested to know that I voted for President Obama and agree with him on a variety of issues. But I will not let my admiration for this President stop me from calling out his unconstitutional actions.

    Reply
  • H

    Human Rights SupporterOct 13, 2011 at 1:23 pm

    I think your article is great. However guilty this man is, the government is not supposed to pick and choose who gets a fair trial and who doesn’t. He’s still a human, after all, and American-born. The issue you’re addressing is not what this man did, so it’s not valid to attack your article as if you are supporting terrorism. You are not saying “Wow, what a great person!” You’re just pointing out that the way the Obama administration handled the situation was unlawful. And, the fact that they aren’t sharing much information with the public looks bad on their part.

    Reply
  • R

    Rights are RightsOct 13, 2011 at 12:44 pm

    They could of brought him back here held him for trial and let him get raped by his cellmate Bubba for a few months.

    Should he die? Hell yea! However a fine but important line has been crossed.. a U.S. Citizen was killed without due process.

    Rights are Rights and cannot be taken away no matter how stupid someone is.

    We should have revoked his citizenship first. Really… then there would be nothing wrong with this story.

    Reply
  • S

    Sgt of MarinesOct 13, 2011 at 9:07 am

    Last month, the government assassinated two American citizens in Yemen with no due process, no trial, no charges and no legal justification.
    No Legal Justification- REALLY!!!!

    Anwar al-Awlaki – Google Search this psycho and tell me whether he’s a true American or not. You know he was a religious advisor for two of the hijackers of the 9/11 terrorist attack.

    Not only that but he had recorded conversations with the Fort Hood Gunman, an Army Officer, who took the lives of his fellow soldiers.

    You’ve really got some nerve with your deceptive propaganda.

    This isn’t an Obama administration thing. This is justification for crimes committed against Americans. And you have the nerve to call this man American. He’s one of the most UnAmerican “Americans” this country ever produced and for you to some way try to justify his crimes against Americans to satisfy you’re internal political beliefs and agenda is not only immorally wrong, but disgusting.

    Reply