We were inundated with Letters to the Editor this past week. We were excited to see the constructive dialogue that has been started by these letters, and appreciated the thoughtfulness of the responses that we received.
Unfortunately, we did not have enough space to accommodate all of the letters we received. We have selected to print those letters which we felt best represented the opinions of the ones submitted. However, we recognize that each of the letters we received had value in its individual opinion, and have chosen to publish all of them online at our Web site (whitmanpioneer.com).
The majority of the letters we received responded to one particular piece, “Greek shirts fittingly convey conformity culture,” which was published as an opinion piece in last week’s issue on Feb. 26.
Much of the criticism we heard on and around campus regarding the greek shirt piece was similar to: “The Pio hates the greeks.” We’d like to emphasize that The Pio does not hate any campus group and strives to maintain objectivity in all of its reporting. All opinion columns are only reflections of individuals’ opinions about their subject matter, and not reflective of The Pioneer as a whole. The only pieces that are reflective of the Pioneer editorial staff are our semi-regular Board Editorials.
It is not important nor relevant what the editors’ opinions on this column, or any column, are. As editors, we often disagree with columns we publish. We are proud to boast a staff who encompass varying viewpoints––our staff members are of all four years, of different majors; they are both greeks and independents, and both liberals and conservatives. The nature of our staff makes it impossible for us to agree with all pieces that come before us. We think it is important that we do not pick and choose pieces for publications based on their stances. Regardless of what we think of their opinions, our columnists have the right to those opinions, and the right to publish them. We support them in this
In the same vein, as readers, you have the right to disagree with those opinions. We want to thank those people who took the time to compose a response and submit a letter––especially those who were angered by a piece. We recognize that it is easy to be angry at something you read, and to simply dismiss and insult it. Those of you who took the time to respond: again, thank you. By contributing your responses to pieces you read, you are adding to the array of viewpoints that we strive to represent, and opening up the avenue for productive and respectful dialogue.
Kim Sommers and Jamie Soukup
Editors-in-Chief