Op-Ed: Response to Aziz Ansari Columns
February 1, 2018
I am frustrated, infuriated and so very tired. But I am not surprised. The two opinion articles published in the January 26 issue of The Wire say the same thing: “Grace” and Aziz were equally culpable for their “bad date.” Whether or not Aziz’s actions are defined as sexual assault, it is clear to me that he violated the consent of his date, and as such, he committed an act of violence.
Why are the standards of conduct so much higher for women than for men? Grace is chastised by India and Rina for being passive, implying that she is responsible for the violation of her own boundaries. Although these two articles claim that both parties are equally responsible, what they ultimately emphasize is that Grace should have beared the burden of articulating her desires in a way that Aziz would understand and respect. Because Grace did not forcefully voice her discomfort, the articles imply that somehow she is responsible for what happened. This is unacceptable. What Grace said was enough. She asked to slow down. She said, “I don’t want to feel forced,” “I don’t think I’m ready to do this.” Grace was uncomfortable, and Aziz chose to ignore this fact in pursuit of his own pleasure. This choice is an act of violence.
The two opinion articles published in The Wire prop up patriarchy and rape culture. I agree that in an ideal world, all sex would be enthusiastic and consensual, and everyone would communicate their desires, discomforts and boundaries freely. But communication is not just about talking, it’s also about listening. By pretending that he was not able to pick up on obvious verbal and nonverbal cues, Aziz attempts to absolve himself of the responsibility to engage in a respectful and mutually enthusiastic manner with his partner.
Patriarchy is a system of hierarchy and domination that is much more than a sum of individual beliefs and actions. Though India’s piece claims a desire to “empower” women to say no, rape culture is not something that can be individually dismantled or rejected. Why is the burden placed upon women like Grace to single-handedly dismiss gender hierarchies? The effect this kind of individualistic “rise above it” rhetoric is victim-blaming, though neither article explicitly says Grace deserved her treatment.
Believing, supporting and empowering women and other survivors of sexual violence means knowing that people make decisions that make the most sense to them in extremely scary, uncomfortable and dangerous situations. We use survival strategies and coping mechanisms that, in many cases, de-escalate very real threats to our safety and our lives.
An absence of “no” does not mean “yes.” With this in mind, Aziz clearly violated Grace’s consent. However, consent is still more complicated than an enthusiastic “yes.” Consent is about mutual respect and care. When it comes to sex –or really any other activity between two or more people– we must be attentive to power disparities that influence each person’s ability to articulate their needs and desires. Aziz’s refusal to listen to and prioritize Grace’s wishes is not uncommon, but it is unacceptable. This is not just about good sex. It is about dismantling rape culture. We must demand better.
Lizzie Thomson • Feb 26, 2018 at 8:07 am
Devon, thanks for writing this piece.
The two initial opinion pieces published by the Wire regarding Ansari are disappointing. I wonder how many more sexual assault situations will be decorated with similar rhetoric: “she didn’t speak up,” and questions like: “why didn’t she say anything?”. You are right, and consent is more than just a verbal “yes”. Consent can be extrapolated beyond the context of sexual assault and seen as a symbol of a larger paradigm of care and compassion for one’s partner and community (extending globally, and including the Earth). You are right! Consent is listening, with ever so subtle a heart and ear, to understand exactly how one can contribute to the greatest good.
In our wordly context, the earth screams bloody murder, yet humans upholding a narrative of “industrial gain” mine deeper. Young children are shot at school, and still gun suppliers sign consent waivers to activate more gun holders.
Where is the consent of the children’s parents who live in the neighborhood of that new gun-carrier? Where is the consent of the animals’, whose home is harvested for energy to power hair dryers and coffee makers?
AND is it really the duty of the potential “victim” to write a statement of consent, or can an individual in a position of potentially destructive power, listen with wisdom of life itself, to discover how she may serve her own greatest interest by protecting the safety of others?
You point at a very interesting question Devon…Ansari claims that he couldn’t read between the lines… CAN sexual violence become obsolete through emotional and social education, so that there are no liminal spaces between “lines” where a woman’s safety so frequently and “easily” disappears?
You call out the common rhetoric of sexual assault being the victim’s responsibility and suggest that, counter to Aziz’s claim of incompetence in reading Grace’s disdain for the situation, everyone is capable of, and responsible for knowing with 102030405% accuracy the comfort and mutual interest of their sexual partner. No room for doubt. And everyone is capable. I agree.
We are capable of listening to the projections of species decline, and boycotting certain companies and products. We are capable of hearing the prejudice and dishonesty in the White House and protesting with our communities. This mysterious and fleeting life we all share pushes us toward empowerment! We have the gifts of vision, a heart that expands with the momentum of the big bang, and feet and hands to express and manifest that expanding vision. We are all capable of reading and investigating the immediate interest and consensual enjoyment of a sexual partner, and excuses like Aziz puts forth are completely unacceptable.
The responsibility of unity. Yeesh.