Whitman news since 1896

Whitman Wire

Vol. CLIV, Issue 9
Whitman news since 1896

Whitman Wire

Whitman news since 1896

Whitman Wire

Students call for removal of Snake River dams

A new environmental group on campus, Rethink Dams, is advocating for the removal of the four dams on the lower Snake River.

Sophomore Fiona Bennitt formed Rethink Dams after she was inspired by the documentary “DamNation.” The new group will work to raise awareness both on campus and in the wider Walla Walla community and to educate people about the potential benefits of breaching the Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose and Lower Granite dams. All four dams are located in the southeast corner of Washington.

“I see this as an issue of science, with wild salmon runs just not coming back despite the tremendous efforts that the Army Corps has made to [encourage] their return. They have done a fantastic job, they have tried really hard, but [the salmon] are just not coming back,” said Bennitt.

Breaching the dams is an ambitious goal. Rethink Dams hopes that its efforts will not only inspire Whitman students and Walla Walla residents to support breaching, but also inspire the creation of chapters at other colleges and universities in the region.

Photo contributed by Bob Carson.
Photo contributed by Bob Carson.

“As a campus, it’s our hope that we inspire … other schools in the Northwest to form their own groups, and [it will] eventually become a big enough issue that enough people know about that the dams will come out,” said sophomore Godwin Peck.

The debate over whether to remove the lower four dams on the Snake River is not new. In the early 2000s, the Walla Walla District Army Corp of Engineers conducted a six-year long, 30-million-dollar study on how to address the damage done by the dams to populations of wild salmon, which are on the endangered species list. The Army Corps decided at the time to install expensive measures to help fish move past the dams.

Jim Waddell, once the top civilian at the Walla Walla District Army Corps of Engineers, has recently advocated for the corps to reconsider dam removal. After retiring, Waddell reviewed the thousands of pages of the Lower Snake River Juvenile Salmon Migration Feasibility Report and found a number of errors. He is now convinced that removing the four dams would not only save wild salmon runs but may save the corps money in the long run.

Waddell met with Bennit in late January and encouraged her to start Rethink Dams.

“It is great to see your generation wanting to take an active and meaningful role in solving some of the nation’s challenges. Many of the challenges we face can no longer can be put off onto some later generation by my generation. It is very important that we approach the solutions to the challengers as a multi-generational team,” said Waddell in an email to The Pioneer.

Alongside saving the salmon and economic sense, members of Rethink Dams cite increased recreational opportunities as another reason to support breaching the dams. Breaching would open up 200 miles of free-flowing river for rafting and kayaking.

In response to recent advocacy for breaching the dams, the Walla Walla Corps of Engineers issued a statement that they have no intention to further examine the economics or environmental benefits of dam removal, and that any decision to remove the dams must be made directly by Congress.

“What you have to do is convince people that the benefits of removing the dam are greater than the costs … The most important thing would be to get the support of the Washington legislators from eastern Washington, and that’s about impossible,” said Professor of Geology and Environmental Studies Bob Carson, who has worked toward the removal of various dams around the Pacific Northwest for 40 years.

Opponents of dam removal argue the dams are needed to generate clean energy and allow shipping up and down the Snake River. The four dams on the lower Snake produce five percent of the energy used in the Pacific Northwest. In addition, the reservoirs formed by the dams provide water for a few large agricultural producers.

“I don’t necessarily think that dams are a bad idea, and I don’t think that every dam should come out, and I don’t think that most dams can come out,” said Bennitt. “But I think when we come across a dam or set of dams where it’s really starting to become questionable why they’re kept in place … that we should investigate those structures and look into whether they should be breached or not.”

View Comments (3)
More to Discover

Comments (3)

All Whitman Wire Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • G

    Gene SpangrudeJul 29, 2016 at 6:15 am

    The current ‘Hot Water Report’ for the Lower Snake River is at this link:

    http://www.wildsalmon.org/projects/climate-change/columbia-and-snake-rivers-hot-water-report-2017.html

    Also, at this link is a current status for the Clearwater River at Orofino, Idaho (note the water temperatures in this somewhat ‘Natural’ upstream reach):

    http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/uv?cb_00060=on&cb_00065=on&cb_00010=on&format=gif_default&site_no=13340000&period=30&begin_date=2016-07-18&end_date=2016-07-25

    The Clearwater presently apparently also is presently above 70 degrees F……

    Here at this link is the current status for the Snake River at Anatone, Washington (note its water temperatures):

    http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/uv?cb_00060=on&cb_00065=on&cb_00010=on&cb_00025=on&cb_00048=on&cb_00047=on&cb_72147=on&format=gif_default&site_no=13334300&period=30&begin_date=2016-07-18&end_date=2016-07-25

    Also a current status for the Salmon River at Whitebird, Idaho; it is also above 70 degrees F:

    http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/uv?cb_00010=on&cb_00060=on&cb_00065=on&format=gif_default&site_no=13317000&period=30&begin_date=2016-07-18&end_date=2016-07-25

    Lastly, a status for the Snake River at Weiser, Idaho; is at this link:

    http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/dv/?site_no=13269000&agency_cd=USGS&referred_module=sw

    The Snake River at Weiser can ‘no longer AFFORD’ to collect Water Temperature data….. NO FUNDS!!!!!

    Interesting that this important parameter can no longer be afforded to be collected; at a location upstream of both the Lower Snake Projects and the Hells Canyon Projects…..

    No doubt it too is currently above 70 degrees there as well…..

    Reply
  • G

    Gene SpangrudeJul 9, 2016 at 8:47 am

    The intense interest in the Lower Snake River continues in 2016.

    Even though Water Temperatures in the Lower Snake River are of major concern, especially with respect to keeping them at 68 degrees Fahrenheit or lower, it is interesting that the collection of Water Temperature data in the Snake River upstream of the Hells Canyon Projects can no longer be afforded; and Water Temperature data collection at the United States Geological Survey’s Weiser and Nyssa gages therefore had to be terminated in late 2015.

    The Snake River at Weiser gage information may be found here:

    http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/dv/?site_no=13269000&agency_cd=USGS&referred_module=sw

    The Snake River at Nyssa gage information may be found here:

    http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/dv/?site_no=13213100&agency_cd=USGS&referred_module=sw

    As can be noted from the above links, even upstream of the Hells Canyon Projects, the water temperatures exceeded 68 Degrees Fahrenheit in the summer of 2015; as well in many prior years for which Water Temperature data is available.

    These two locations generally represent the Snake River’s ‘inflowing conditions’ to the Hells Canyon Projects and ultimately to the four Lower Snake River projects. It should therefore be relevant to have Water Temperature data at these two upstream locations on the Snake River.

    As an issue of science and the analysis of relevant data, hopefully funding will be found to resume Water Temperature data collection at these two locations, given the continuing intense interest in the Lower Snake River’s Water Temperatures.

    Reply
  • G

    Gene SpangrudeFeb 27, 2015 at 6:31 pm

    Given the renewed interest in removing the four Lower Snake River Dams to aid in Salmon recovery, I recommend reading these two items, which provide some historical insight with respect to salmon numbers:

    1. Chapman, D.W. (1986). “Salmon and Steelhead Abundance in the Columbia River in the Nineteenth Century,” Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 115:662-670.

    2. McDonald, Marshall (1894). Report of the United States Commissioner of Fish and Fisheries on Investigations in the Columbia River Basin In Regard to the Salmon Fisheries, Government Printing Office, Washington D.C.

    Chapman’s article contains an interesting graph of “Salmon Catch (Harvest) vs time (from about 1870 to 1970) as well as a listing of numerous other interesting references related to Salmon.

    McDonald’s 1894 report states that “there is no reason to doubt- indeed the fact is beyond question- that the number of salmon now reaching the head waters of streams in the Columbia River Basin is insignificant in comparison with the number which some years ago annually visited and spawned in these waters. It is further apparent that this decrease is not to be attributed either to the contraction of the area accessible to them or to changed conditions in the waters which would deter the salmon from entering them.”

    To give some perspective, the problem of declining Salmon numbers was noted prior to 1900 and the first Lower Snake River project was completed in the early 1960’s; more than sixty years later.

    Reply