They came with the night, ready to brave the cold. They were armed with sleeping bags, propane heaters and hot coffee. They came 24 hours before Sarah Palin would arrive at the Hastings bookstore in Richland, Wash. on November 29 because they were true believers.
“She’s the first politician in the last 20 years I’ve admired,” one man waiting in line said.
Palin has all of the hallmarks of a charismatic leader and populist politician. The die-hard Palinites that stoically bore the cold Saturday night were less inclined to talk about issues and more about Sarah: and indeed everyone in line was on a first name basis with Palin.
Her supporters confirmed that there was something different about Palin that drew them unlike any other candidate.
“She’s not an ordinary politician . . . if it were Mike Huckabee or Romney . . . you wouldn’t see a line like this,” said Jeff of Camas, Wash.
So if it isn’t her policies, what is it about Sarah Palin that is making everyone from grandmothers to college students and children wait for dozens of hours in freezing cold weather just for a signature and a glimpse of the one-time vice-presidential candidate and half-term governor of Alaska?
I found that among her supporters there are three things about Palin that set her apart.
First, “She’s one of us,” said Donna of Richland.
“She not only talks the talk, she walks the walk,” said Erin of Richland, with conviction.
Finally, both men and women waiting in line were quick to say that Palin could be our first female president.
“She is a great woman leader,” Kelsey, a sophomore at WSU, said, and though she might not win, Kelsey was confident that Palin is forging new opportunities for women in politics.
“One of Us”
There was consensus among the people waiting in line that night that Sarah Palin was “average” and represented common people’s interests. Comments along this line ranged from her origins in rural America to her speaking style. When I asked what she liked so much about Palin, Donna answered that Palin is “small town [and] honest” and that “she talks on an average level, so people can understand.”
Indeed, almost every person I interviewed mentioned that Palin just talks “common sense” or “tells it like it is.”
In the same vein, a concern emanated from Palin’s supporters about their lack of representation in the mainstream media and political structure. Many of these concerns were expressed in terms of economics.
“There’s no way people can spend that much money and we still come out,” said Tara of Eltopia, Wash. when discussing the influence of money on politics.
There was also the feeling that average people weren’t benefiting from government policies, particularly regarding Obama’s response to the recession.
“[The government is] bailing out people when they don’t need it and keeps paying their top people millions,” said Donna with dismay.
Chris of Richland echoed this sentiment.
“People think conservatives don’t care about poor people, but I think it is the opposite. Liberals are in the guise of caring about poor people, but they only care about themselves.”
However, there was also a more fundamental question of integrity underlying many people’s comments. A common viewpoint was that the people with power, whether in the government or media, are corrupt compared to average Americans.
“The corruption, getting rid of the corruption,” said Nancy of Richland, on what issue was important to her. “We’ve just seen people who are a minority talking and making laws while the majority sits back.”
The image of Palin as the outsider, the common person coming in and cleaning up politics was reiterated by Josh, who grew up in Alaska.
“[I’ve] seen firsthand Alaska politics and corruption,” said Josh. He went on to say that he was impressed by Palin’s ability to confront corrupt oil companies and politicians there.
It appears that the most significant aspect of Palin’s appeal is indeed people’s sense of alienation from power, and more specifically from the powerful themselves, that many Americans feel today.
“She Walks the Walk”
An enormous part of the enthusiasm I encountered derived from how Palin didn’t just advocate ideas, but lived her values.
“[Palin has] good American values, good family, and she shows us through her own family what should be happening,” said Kelsey, the WSU student.
Paradoxically, yet perhaps profoundly, perceptions of Palin’s values were not derived from her and her family’s perfection but rather their struggles. While speaking about the pregnancy of Palin’s daughter Bristol, Kelsey reiterated that “they are a real American family; they aren’t perfect,” and contrasted them with the seemingly perfect Obama family.
If there is one issue that did seem important to everyone to whom I spoke, it was abortion. It was on this issue perhaps more than anything that Palin inspired admiration and respect among her supporters. In case you don’t know, Palin’s son Trig has Down syndrome and Palin made the decision not to have an abortion despite this fact.
For Jeff, Palin’s decision not to abort Trig is intensely personal.
“I feel a lot of similarities between me and Trig. My mom told me some things about her similar situation and Sarah’s,” he said.
Kelsey also expressed admiration for Palin’s strength in choosing to have her son, though she added that she didn’t know what she would do regarding an unwanted pregnancy.
When I asked Erin which of Palin’s stands on issues resonated with her she also brought up abortion.
“[Her] pro-life [stance] for sure, especially since she has her son. She could have had an abortion, but she didn’t. I really respect that,” she said.
It is easy to be cynical about any political movement driven by a charismatic personality. But Palin’s supporters revealed a deep identification with the struggle to live out your values in an often-hostile society. I couldn’t help but admire them greatly for their thoughtfulness.
“The First Woman President”
When my friend, senior Matt Ozuna, inquired whether Jeff thought America was ready for a female President, Jeff’s retort was quick.
“I’m ready for a female president!”
Erin echoed that sentiment.
“I hope she is the first female president of the U.S.A.!”
Palin’s status as a conservative female seemed to be an important animating factor in her appeal to many people who gathered to see her. Not everyone agreed that it was significant that Palin could possibly be the first female president.
“People make too much of whether someone is black or white, male or female,” one woman said. Natasha, of the former USSR, was adamant that her gender was in no way related to her appeal.
Yet when I asked whether people think it’s important that Palin is female, others responded affirmatively.
“Oh yes, I do, I definitely do,” Chris said.
Similarly, when I asked why she was waiting all night to see Palin, Kelsey immediately responded: “I’m out here because she is a great woman leader and we are women and young.”
Palin’s attractiveness as a female candidate seemed to be inseparable from her appeal as a conservative and, in particular, her stance on abortion.
“I think it is important that she is a woman and believes that . . . men don’t know what it’s like, but she does,” said Chloe of Pendleton, Ore. about the connection between Palin’s pro-life stance and her gender.
While perhaps the desire for a female president wouldn’t have driven the crowd in Richland to vote for Hilary Clinton, the possibility of a female presidential candidate that shared their values seemed to be a powerful driving force behind Palin’s popularity.
Meeting Sarah
When I arrived back at the Hastings bookstore the morning of Palin’s arrival, the line had grown so long that it stretched well out of sight. I got back into my spot at the front of the line that had been diligently defended through the night.
Palin arrived to the high pitch screaming of her devoted fans, carrying a young child (her daughter’s?) in her arms, looking distinctly un-presidential in a poofy, flowery red top. The book-signing was a family affair, with her father, brother and other unrecognizable relatives all there to shake hands.
I met Sarah Palin, briefly, and she was interested enough to ask what I did for a living. I told her I wrote for my college’s newspaper and had the time to fire off one question: “Are you the future of the Republican Party?”
She smirked, hesitated, gave a little laugh and responded coyly, “. . . Could be.”
Whether that prospect disturbs you or inspires you, one thing is for sure: Palin is a force to be reckoned with.
Bécquer Medak-SeguÃÂn • Dec 7, 2009 at 8:33 am
It is unfortunate that the Whitman Pioneer, a privileged part of Whitman’s intellectual community, has published a piece that so woefully undermines critical thinking. Mr. Potter’s piece, though mostly veiled as expository writing, presents two claims: Sarah Palin is “a force to be reckoned with†politically and the supporters interviewed and quoted are thoughtful. While it remains to be seen whether the first claim materializes (I hope that Mr. Potter reveals evidence for this in the future: I hope he is not relying on imported release-party crowds to a Tri-Cities bookstore as a synecdoche for the national political thought even within the Republican Party), the second claim is certainly questionable. That is, of course, unless thoughtfulness does not, at least in part, include critical thinking.
One of the main claims of those quoted is that Ms. Palin is “honest.†She, in fact, is not –at least while she’s in office. A critical inquiry into this “honesty†would reveal that in 1997, Ms. Palin was almost recalled from office as Mayor of Wasilla for firing the city police chief and library director. When asked for the reason as to why these two were fired, Ms. Palin said that they “did not fully support her efforts to govern.†In fact, this was not the case. Ms. Palin fired both because they supported Ms. Palin’s opponent, John Stein, during the 1996 mayoral election. The police chief filed a lawsuit for wrongful termination against Ms. Palin and, although he lost because the judge deemed that the police chief serves at the discretion of the mayor, she has yet to admit that she lied about her reasons for firing him. Another well-known case of Ms. Palin lying during office is her dismissal of Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan. Since many are already aware of what happened, I will simply reiterate that a bipartisan commissioned legislative investigator found that Ms. Palin lied about her reasons for firing Mr. Monegan. These findings were published in what is called the Branchflower Report.
I would hope that two scandals of this magnitude revealing Ms. Palin’s dishonesty would undermine what some of Mr. Potter’s interviewees call her “integrity.†If Mr. Potter would’ve engaged in journalism that promoted critical thinking, instead of merely taking Ms. Palin at her ethically questionable word, this piece would’ve likely revealed less superficial reasons as to why his interviewees followed Ms. Palin’s politics and, for once, demanded Palinites to think critically about their candidate.
As Aristotle reminds us, “it is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.†I only hope that in the future, the Whitman Pioneer seeks to cultivate better-educated minds.
Alex • Dec 7, 2009 at 11:27 pm
Mr. Medak-Seguin,
It seems like you are an avid consumer of my column, so at least I know one person is reading it! I was surprised, however, at your biting comments about this article since I have gotten nothing but positive reviews so far from people who have read it.
I think the problem is that you misunderstood the point of the article. Your argument about Palin’s political history is, of course, a wonderful thing to point out and discuss. I am not personally a Palin supporter, especially not for the presidency, and agree with you that she has a questionable history.
But the point of this article was not to voice my own opinion of Palin, which I could rant for a long time about. It was rather to find out what motivates hard-core Palin supporters to freeze all night just to meet her. Every single person I talked to mentioned her personal integrity and I was not on a mission to change their minds or argue with them. Rather, I wanted to understand how they defined themselves, to give them a voice, something that I think is rarely heard on this campus and that the bitterness of your response perhaps indicates is more intolerant than even I imagined.
You might think that the people I interviewed weren’t thoughtful and you are right that some of them were not. But I think my article speaks for itself that for many of these people, their support of Palin touches on some deep and legitimate beliefs and experiences. Some journalists take a combative position while interviewing, I decided that by waiting in line, chatting, and befriending some of the people, I got at their motivations. Once again, I think the article makes this clear, particularly on the abortion issue.
Indeed, I actually find it offensive that you would imply that a man with down syndrome who says he resonates with Palin’s decision not to abort her son is somehow “unthoughtful” about his position or doesn’t understand the meaning of integrity.
Finally, while you might not like it, Palin’s book has already sold one million copies and has been at the top of the NYT bestsellers for a couple weeks now. Crowds like what I encountered have happened all over the U.S. when she has done a book-signing. So I especially take issue with your dismissal of her influence.