Sometimes there is an inclination to distrust the U.S. government and Western medicine. We have heard about things like the medical industrial complex. So as an alternative, some people are more willing to trust natural remedies. In most cases, trusting these kinds of herbal healers would not be a problem. But for serious diseases like AIDS, any so-called cure is immoral because it spreads false hope. In certain parts of Africa, there is little or no access to antiretroviral drugs. Those with AIDS have little hope and sometimes cling to any cure that anyone proposes.
An example is seen in Gambia. In 2007, President Yahya Jammeh proposed and administered an AIDS cure. The Gambian health ministry claimed the cure eradicated the virus from patients. However, the original viral load tests were done in a university in Dakar, Senegal and showed patients still had significant amounts of the virus in their blood. The government dismissed this claim and refused to reveal what was in the cure. So how do you spot a hoax AIDS cure or any other herbal cure?
Well, there are a few ways: First, no medical expert or healer would ever claim that a cure is a miracle breakthrough or that it can cure 100 percent of patients. Also, no medical expert would claim that a certain substance can cure many different diseases. First of all, there is no single cure that can work for everyone. Different people react differently to different medicines. There are all different types of people with all different body types; no cure will be 100 percent effective. Other times, people have allergies which do not allow them to take a certain medicine, whether it is synthetic or herbal.
Another example is that just because a medicine is natural does not always mean that that medicine is good. Many natural chemicals can be harmful to humans. For example, hemlock and ricin both occur naturally in the castor bean, and they are extremely toxic. Also, note that just because a substance is man-made does not mean that it will be bad for you.
A third way to tell is by seeing how many people a herbal drug has been tested on. The only way to check a drug’s effectiveness is by testing it among many patients. However, some herbal healers may say they have not been able to do adequate testing because the U.S. government shut them down or suppressed information on their cure to protect U.S. interest in established lucrative medical companies.
They claim that the medical industrial complex exists through government. Even if this were true, the only way to know a drug’s effectiveness is through extensive testing.
Conspiracy theories may say that the government or medical companies may be suppressing the cure for AIDS. However, the truth is that western medicine still has difficulty finding a cure. Antiretroviral drugs can suppress HIV in the body’s system, but they cannot cure patients. The tricky part is that the virus inserts its genetic material into a host’s cells and remains dormant for years or decades while the patient takes the antiretroviral drugs. Current research is looking for a way to destroy these infected cells. Furthermore, government conspiracies asserted by these kinds of herbal healers may be overblown.
The U.S. government does not solely support lucrative drugs. For example, the government is currently doing research on human hormones such as interleukin-2. Like the human genome, these cannot be patented and therefore cannot yield large profits.
So, people can be skeptical of the U.S. government: it is healthy to do so, and it is their right as U.S. citizens: but people should also be wary of herbal healers.
Ted Hendershot • Oct 17, 2011 at 5:30 pm
I feel the need to post the video that the Tim Minchin quote comes from, because it’s amazing.
Storm (the Animated Movie):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhGuXCuDb1U
mattyi • Oct 17, 2011 at 6:27 am
Whether something is herbal, natural or patented (are you kidding me?) has no bearing on whether something is effective.
The list of medicines that come from natural sources is incredibly long.
Morphine is natural and comes from poppy. Some anti-cancer drugs are derived from yew. There are anti-malarial drugs derived from sweet wormwood. Aspirin is derived from willow bark. Freaking penicillin was derived from fungi.
The difference between these medicines and snake oil is that they were experimentally verified via scientific method, showing statistically significant, REPEATABLE effects. Without reliable and repeatable proof, all claims of effectiveness are simply noise.
“By definition, alternative medicine is either not been proved to work, or proved not to work. Do you know what they call alternative medicine that’s been proved to work? Medicine.” -Tim Minchin
Spencer • Oct 17, 2011 at 3:39 am
John Smith, C, care to provide any sources to support your claims? As far as I know, very few “alternative medicine” practices have withstood the scrutiny of carefully executed, double-blind trials. Alternative medicine tends to be supported by anecdotal evidence that hasn’t been critically evaluated.
And “John,” shouting “WAKE UP!” is never an effective way to make your point. Let your evidence and your arguments stand on your own. Implying that the people you’re arguing/discussing with are ignorant or weak-willed and need to “wake up” doesn’t do a thing to help your point, it just associates you with irrational conspiracy theorists–the kind of people who are so convinced they’re right that there’s absolutely no evidence or argument that could possibly change their mind. That’s not the kind of person you want to be, either in a debate or in general.
C • Oct 13, 2011 at 2:58 pm
I think that this article’s title is over-general and misleading; it should really be more along the lines of “Herbal cures for AIDS not a valid substitute for medicine”, because that really seems to be what it’s focusing on. I agree with what the author is saying regarding treatments for AIDS specifically. However, there is actually a lot of research out there about natural/herbal medication being used quite effectively to treat other health issues.
John Smith • Oct 13, 2011 at 9:16 am
Whoever wrote this article has utterly wasted their time. The writer has clearly demonstrated a lack of knowledge regarding botanical remedies which are now being utilized as adjunctive therapies to conventional medicine. Conventional medicine is an outdated form of medicine. The writer should be current with medicine in the 21st century. The paradigm has shifted toward a so-called Integrative Medicine. A predominant portion of our PATENTED drugs are derived from plants. WAKE UP! STOP SPREADING MISINFORMATION!