Students Protest Snake River Dams with Flotilla
October 7, 2015
Whitman students and other members of the Whitman community participated in a flotilla protest on the Snake River last weekend to advocate for the closing of four dams located on the lower part of the river.
The flotilla involved paddling, boating and kayaking along the lower Snake while holding signs to show the ecological and economic problems with the dams. The protesters documented the event with video cameras, photographs and drones to use the footage in a social media campaign to show legislators the support for this issue.Over 300 people attended the flotilla, including approximately 40 people from Whitman College.
“It definitely felt like we were a part of something greater because we made up a big chunk of the group… more than 10 percent of the people there were from Whitman. It was really cool,” said junior Betsey Olk, who attended the flotilla.
The dams have been a contentious issue to the river as they greatly alter the ecosystem for native salmon and other wildlife, but also provide five percent of the Pacific Northwest’s energy through hydroelectric power.
“The debate over the Snake River dams represents a larger, national conversation regarding the role of dams in a changing, warming world…Following on the removal of the Elwha River dams, the removal of the Snake River dams would set national precedent and give birth to a necessary reconsideration of national energy sources and issues of conservation,” said junior Fiona Bennitt in an email.
Bennitt founded Rethink Dams last spring, a student organization which advocates for the removal of the Snake River’s four lower dams. She is off-campus this semester, and in her absence junior Mariah Bruns took over organizing the event.
The flotilla protest was part of a larger effort by the group Save our Wild Salmon, a group aimed at restoring wild salmon population in the Snake River by closing the four lower dams. The flotilla was sponsored by a variety of environmental advocacy groups, including Patagonia, who produced the 2014 documentary “Damnation”, which focused on the negative effects that dams can have on wildlife and ecosystems. The producers of “Damnation” attended the event and encouraged participants to photograph and record the event to use in further social media campaigns.
“There weren’t many people watching [the flotilla] because it’s a Saturday, so there’s nobody working on the dam and it’s kind of in the middle of nowhere so it’s not like there’s a lot of people that we were influencing, but that’s something we talked about afterwards, that it felt kind of weird to us that we were doing this big thing for nobody,” said Olk.
“But the big thing was documented so that it can be seen by Congress and Obama and just the general public. And so I think the main goal was to get our message out but in more of a social media, online way.”
Rethink Dams hopes that by taking this event and documenting it through video and photos, the event can gain more publicity.
“I think it’s going to be mostly through visuals and media that people really learn about this issue, but I think that can also be a really effective form of communication when it comes to activism,” said Bruns.
Gene Spangrude • Oct 14, 2015 at 6:58 am
Given the renewed interest in removing the four Lower Snake River Dams to aid in Salmon recovery, I recommend reading these two items, which provide some historical insight with respect to salmon numbers:
1. Chapman, D.W. (1986). “Salmon and Steelhead Abundance in the Columbia River in the Nineteenth Century,” Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 115:662-670.
2. McDonald, Marshall (1894). Report of the United States Commissioner of Fish and Fisheries on Investigations in the Columbia River Basin In Regard to the Salmon Fisheries, Government Printing Office, Washington D.C.
Chapman’s article contains an interesting graph of “Salmon Catch (Harvest) vs time (from about 1870 to 1970) as well as a listing of numerous other interesting references related to Salmon.
McDonald’s 1894 report states that “there is no reason to doubt- indeed the fact is beyond question- that the number of salmon now reaching the head waters of streams in the Columbia River Basin is insignificant in comparison with the number which some years ago annually visited and spawned in these waters. It is further apparent that this decrease is not to be attributed either to the contraction of the area accessible to them or to changed conditions in the waters which would deter the salmon from entering them.”
To give some perspective, the problem of declining Salmon numbers was noted prior to 1900 and the first Lower Snake River project was completed in the early 1960’s; more than sixty years later.
Water temperature data was collected on the Lower Snake River from 1952 through 1956; which was therefore done under free-flowing conditions prior to the construction of the four Lower Snake River projects.
The data collection results are summarized in United States Geological Survey (USGS) Water Supply Paper #1253 (for the year 1952), USGS Water Supply Paper # 1293 (for the year 1953), USGS Water Supply Paper #1353 (for the year 1954), USGS Water Supply Paper #1403 (for the year 1955), and USGS Water Supply Paper #1453 (for the year 1956).
During this time, temperatures in excess of 65 degrees Fahrenheit were recorded on 304 days, which is approximately 17 per cent of the total observations, or about one out of every six made. Temperatures in excess of 70 degrees Fahrenheit were noted on 100 days, which is about 5 percent of the total observations, or about one out of every 20 made.
Even prior to the Snake River Dams, water temperatures of 79 degrees F were being noted on occasion, on the Lower Snake River; eleven (11) degrees warmer than the 68 degrees F value frequently used as a target to achieve.
Dave Baldwin, '89 • Oct 9, 2015 at 10:50 am
I rafted the Snake many times in my time at Whitman. It was always a great trip, even when my head and my camera box collided mid-rapid! We knew it was dam-controlled, of course, but never thought to try to change that. I’m glad this generation is a little less accepting of the status quo!
Anwar • Oct 8, 2015 at 6:55 am
Great work!!! Remove those harmful dams !!!