November 14th, 2024 – At 6:12 this morning, a shuttle bus parked outside Cordiner Hall with the goal of taking members of the Board of Trustees to their meeting. The location of the meeting changed recently from Memorial Hall to Three Rivers Convention Center in Kennewick, WA.
This decision came in the face of recent student protests and vandalism outside Memorial Hall. The Wire independently confirmed that the Board of Trustees, faculty, and student representatives were notified of the location change by email yesterday morning, and were given the reasoning of “avoiding disruption.”
Shortly after, a group of students dressed in Keffiyehs and white t-shirts covered with red handprints arrived at the shuttle and held a die-in around the bus. Members of the Board who arrived at Cordiner Hall were told not to leave their cars. The pick-up location changed from outside Cordiner Hall to the Finch, a hotel on Main St, around 6:30 am, the time the Board was originally scheduled to depart.
Members of the Board relocated via shuttle and personal vehicle to the Three River Convention Center in Kennewick, WA.
Three reporters from The Wire were denied entry from the Center. As of 8:40 this morning, these reporters have been threatened with police involvement by the event manager and head of Whitman Security, Greg Powell.
Wire reporters were ordered to leave the property by Event Manager Roni Gierke. Gierke handed reporters a copy of the Center’s protest policy in lieu of explaining her orders. When the Wire reporters clearly displayed their press credentials, Gierke insisted that the reporters leave. Gierke told reporters she was calling the police.
Wire reporters left the Center before the police arrived. President Sarah Bolton has not responded to requests for comment regarding the college’s position on student press rights.
The sidewalk around Cordiner was chalked with messages overnight, calling out the Board’s lack of response to students’ calls for divestment from military contractors.
Student protesters followed the bus to the Finch, where they lay in front of the entrance and on the pavement in front of the bus.
“It’s just a continuation of the Board of Trustees being unwilling to engage with students and its fear that we are going to escalate things….Something like a die-in is a relatively peaceful protest and it’s disappointing to see them unwilling to engage with us,” said Seth.*
Members of staff and the Board of Trustees have refused all comments and questions.
“We were lying silently on the ground and leaving a clear walkway for Trustees. Their complete avoidance of us demonstrates an unwillingness to engage with students’ anger at their refusal to create a committee for divestment. We will not stand by while they remain inactive and smug in the face of genocide,” said Tom.*
Whitman Assistant Dean of Students and Director of Security, Greg Powell, instructed the protesters to move off of the sidewalk and roads. This was the furthest extent to which protesters were directly addressed by members of the college. The protesters complied and Board members were able to board the bus. They departed for Kennewick at roughly 6:40 am.
Despite the Board’s avoidance, an anonymous protester said they felt their actions were effective.
“I think it speaks to the effectiveness of the student organizing, that they’re scared to show their faces on campus [because] they know that students are pissed off. I think it’s pretty clear that they feel quite a bit of shame about that, otherwise they would be here, y’know?” Regina said.*
However, regardless of the effectiveness of the protest, students are still incredibly disappointed with the decision of the Board of Trustees to move their meeting an hour away from campus.
“There’s been no direct threat of anything that we’re going to impede their order of operations and their job. It’s sad on their part,” Regina said.*
“The fact that they would move their meeting an hour away from the college that they are theoretically representing just to avoid a conversation with students about a genocide which is affecting many of the students that they claim to represent the interests of is disgusting. The lengths that they will go to in order to avoid students, protect their bubble and prevent engagement in not just divestment but dialogue is truly shameful,” said Patrick.*
“Free Palestine. Divest now,” said Seth.*
This is a breaking story and it will be updated continuously.
*Seth, Tom, Regina, and Patrick are all pseudonyms used to protect the source’s anonymity.
Anonymous Student • Nov 14, 2024 at 7:42 pm
Did anyone stop to ask how this made Jewish students with loved ones in Israel feel? Speaking for me and my friends, we are incredibly intimidated and scared. This on the heals of SJP holding a vigil on October 7th that ONLY recognized Palestinian lives, even after we reached out to SJP explaining how we wanted a space to grieve our dead as well. This on the heals of a week of action that occurred exclusively during the Days of Awe, even after we reached out explaining the sacredness of these days. This is on the heals of an art build that happened just hours before Simchat Torah began (the holiday on which the October 7th attacked happened last year). SJP has been repeatedly disrespectful and unkind to their fellow students. Hold them accountable! It is unacceptable to appropriate significant dates, and then proceed to intimidate the trustees.
Let me be clear, the Palestinian cause is important. Israel has committed war crimes in the ongoing war in Gaza. Netanyahu must be held to account for any violations of international law, and we need a ceasefire now. Students also have a right to protest, and are rightfully angry. However, that does not give you an excuse to violate policy, intimidate others, and create a hostile campus environment. At a certain point, you have to take accountability for your actions. If a cause is so important that it is worth engaging in vandalism for, then you should be willing to accept to reprocusions for it. Same thing when it comes to blocking the trustee bus. You have a right to protest, but when your protest violates policy, you have to be prepared to held to account. This is how protest and free speech work. You have a right to free speech, but that does not mean that you cannot be held accountable when things cross the line. Let me also point out the double standard that exists on this campus – if me and my friends held a protest during Ramadan chanting “we don’t want peace on stolen land”, people would rightfully be offended by that. It is a call for violence, during a very sacred time of year. Yet, SJP is able to do that during the Days of Awe without the slightest bit of condemnation from anyone. We have been made to repeatedly feel austracized and unwelcome on campus. We have been told that our loved ones in Israel “had it coming”. We have been repeatedly intimidated. How are we supposed to feel safe after this? I support Palestinian liberation work. I believe both Israelis and Palestinians have a fundamental right to peace, safety, and a state. However, I have been told repeatedly that my people do not have a right to exist in our ancestral homeland. A student has told me that Israel has no right to exist. In another instant, a student called me selfish for being a zionist. Whitman has normalized anti-Jewish bias. They must now hold SJP to account. Things have gone too far.
NoJusticeNoPeace • Nov 15, 2024 at 11:14 am
There is no “two sides” to genocide. SJP has done nothing to intimidate Jewish students, and has been clear to assert that Judaism and Zionism are not the same. If you feel intimidated by calls for Palestinian liberation, which start with divestment, than you are not truly for Palestinian liberation, something already clear by your statement that you are a Zionist, an ideology fundamentally in opposition to peace and justice for Palestinians. By claiming SJP’s mission is “normalizing anti-Jewish bias,” you yourself are reinforcing the connection between criticism of Israel and antisemitism. Reinforcing that connection between Zionism and Judaism is in fact itself a driving force of antisemitism, which puts anti-genocide Jews, Palestinians, and allies at serious risk.
Wallahi • Nov 15, 2024 at 4:26 pm
Respectfully, why would students do that? Would we stop ourselves to ask how colonizers of the US felt with family in Britain? How Nazi sympathizers felt during the Holocaust? How slaveholders felt about abolition? No, because nobody is genociding the oppressor right now. We don’t need to humanize the oppressor, because that is precisely what our governments, the media, and countless others so assiduously do.
After this past year, it take it you are likely set in your beliefs and unwilling to change. But I would really encourage you to think critically about the hypocrisy of your statement. One cannot be a Zionist–liberal or otherwise–and contend to care about liberation (of anyone, Palestinians, indigenous peoples, Black and queer folks). Anti-Jewish bias is obviously unacceptable. But you feeling uncomfortable or disagreeing is not tantamount to being unsafe, and never will be. I suggest you either educate yourself and become truly pro-Palestine/liberation or commit to being a pro-Israel Zionist. There really is no in-between.
Dissapointed... • Nov 14, 2024 at 4:08 pm
I must’ve missed the chapter in Joe Davis’ “The Generous Leader” that talks about fleeing accountability…
Alum 2024 • Nov 14, 2024 at 10:03 am
So I keep getting emails asking for donations rather than Trustees addressing issues that current students AND alumni are concerned with. Did the Trustees inform themselves on the genocide that is currently happening? And how this is much more than student conduct, this is about violation of human rights (which Whitman seemingly supports with their actions and silence).
Christine • Nov 14, 2024 at 9:27 am
Glad to see students on the right side of history – taking direct action to protest Whitman’s investment in genocide!!