Whitman news since 1896

Whitman Wire

Vol. CLIV, Issue 10
Whitman news since 1896

Whitman Wire

Whitman news since 1896

Whitman Wire

Many departments lack open courses for incoming fall students

Credit: Molly Johanson

Upperclassmen have completed preregistration for the fall 2011 semester, leaving many introductory-level courses completely filled. Departments including politics, philosophy, sociology and psychology are struggling to find space for incoming first-year students. Meanwhile, the administration plans to solve the problem by increasing class sizes or creating more classes, which will most likely be taught by visiting professors.

Enrollment pressure for incoming first-years has increased with the introduction of the 3-2 course switch, but other factors also contribute to the problem. According to ASWC Vice President senior John Loranger, the 3-2 switch is a major reason for enrollment pressure, but is not the only problem.

“We’re having faculty teaching fewer courses this year, and then we have the largest student body in the history of the college, and to compound those two issues we have course compression,” he said.

Provost and Dean of Faculty Timothy Kaufman-Osborn will decide in the upcoming week which departments will have courses added to make up for a lack of available course seats. He anticipates that if additional faculty are needed, the hiring process will begin over the summer.

“There’s two criteria that I need [to add courses]. I need the financial resources available to me, but I also want to ensure that I find qualified people,” Kaufman-Osborn said.

Chair of the Sociology Department Keith Farrington worries, however, that hiring professors this late in the academic year may not bode well for next semester.

“I think that when you’re hiring someone to teach the next year, you’re at the end of the hiring year and the most excellent of candidates are already hired, meaning we’re not dealing with the best pool of possible candidates,” he said.

First-year ASWC Senator Brian Choe believes that increasing class sizes and opening new sections of intro-level courses taught by visiting professors may be a short-term solution, but it may not be doing incoming students justice in the long run.

“As a liberal arts school, we pride ourselves in small class sizes. As classes get bigger, it’s going to affect our image and the way we learn,” Choe said. “For first-years who have a hard time in an introductory class with a visiting professor, the solid foundation of what they want to major in is not solid at all and they don’t have anything to work off of.”

Hiring new professors to teach sections of classes for incoming students is not an easy task. Choe’s opinion of professors echoes the sentiments of many Whitman students who have had classes taught by visiting professors.

“I’m really frustrated because my experience in the science department has swayed me away from majoring in science because of the negative experience of having a visiting professor in place of a tenure-track faculty,” said first-year Julia Stone.

Incoming first-years, however, are not too worried about having to wait to take classes from tenure track faculty. Sarah Cronk, an incoming student from Bettendorf, Iowa is disappointed that she will have a hard time getting into introductory-level courses taught by regular Whitman faculty; however, she is confident that Whitman is working on the issue and holds out hope that her following three years of registration won’t be as difficult.

“I’m a little disappointed because you hear about certain classes that are taught by amazing professors, and we won’t get to take them at first,” Cronk said. “I figure that I have four years to eventually get into classes I want.”

First-year ASWC Senator Kayvon Behroozian believes the key to getting an ideal schedule for incoming students is planning ahead.

“I didn’t get into any classes I wanted during pre-registration, but what I had done before pre-registration is I e-mailed professors to be put on my waiting list and I was let into those classes,” Behroozian said. “It’s frustrating, but if you plan ahead, you have a chance of getting into the classes you want.”

Kaufman-Osborn ensures incoming students that while registration may be difficult for students initially, Whitman guarantees students sufficient credits to stay on track for graduation in declared majors within four years and the opportunity to satisfy distribution requirements and elective courses corresponding to their interests.

“The college cannot guarantee that every student is going to get the course he/she wants in the semester he/she wants,” he said. “[But] it does have an obligation that students meet the requirements [expected] of them as a condition of graduation, and I fully intend to keep that commitment.”

View Comments (5)
More to Discover

Comments (5)

All Whitman Wire Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • S

    Shampa BiswasMay 10, 2011 at 8:07 am

    Dear concerned,

    I think you raise a very good point – professors, like any workers, who have a long term stake in the college will tend to put more effort and perform better in general – and yes, that is the reason the college should increase the number of TT lines. Meanwhile, I think we should still recognize that we have many visiting faculty who are very dedicated and effective teachers.

    Reply
  • C

    concerned...May 8, 2011 at 4:00 pm

    I think the concern students have with visiting professors is not that they are unqualified to be a good teacher but the fact is that the incentives for a visiting professor to teach are minimal compared with the incentive for a visiting professor to do the “minimum” they can at Whitman and spend all of their time publishing articles and looking for tenure track positions elsewhere.

    So, yes, the ideal solution would be for the board of trustees to fund more tenure track lines…but then again, having a great basketball team is also important for Whitman’s brand…

    Reply
  • E

    Elyse SemerdjianMay 7, 2011 at 4:46 pm

    I agree with the postings above. I am always impressed with the high quality visiting faculty at Whitman College. In the last few years I have noted that visiting faculty members have earned awards (external and internal) and research fellowships at some of the nation’s finest institutions. I have had opportunities for teaching collaboration with visiting faculty and have always been saddened when their term ended on campus because I have considered them close colleagues. One visiting faculty member who replaced me while I was on a Fulbright in 2007-2008 is now holding a chair position at UCLA, a testament to the high quality of many visiting faculty. I realize that not every visiting faculty member is the same, there are always exceptions. As Professor Biswas notes these positions are shaped by the nature of the market, national trends show that colleges and universities are increasingly dependent upon non-tenure track positions because it is easier on their budgets. The best way to alleviate this is to encourage more tenure track lines and internal replacement lines.

    Reply
  • S

    Shampa BiswasMay 7, 2011 at 8:54 am

    I strongly agree with the above post. One or even a few students’ bad experiences with visiting professors should in no way be used to condemn all visiting professors. Many students have negative experiences with tenure-track faculty as well, and yet that is not used to generalize about all TT faculty! We have had and still have EXCELLENT visiting professors, who don’t have TT lines because the academic market is in very bad shape and increasingly reliant on exploiting highly qualified candidates on renewable contracts. We need to recognize the hard work, accomplishments and many contributions of our visiting professors!

    Reply
  • W

    Whitman VAPMay 6, 2011 at 5:35 pm

    While I am sympathetic to student frustration with class registration, I think it a grave mistake to assume that Visiting Professors are inherently less competent, knowledgeable or engaging teachers than our tenured or tenure-track colleagues. Visiting Professors have phds and often have teaching experience and excellent student evaluations! The academic job market is such that many, many highly educated, promising teacher-scholars are unable to find tenure-track teaching positions right out of graduate school, particularly in the humanities and some corners of the social sciences. While it is fair to assume that newer teachers will be less skilled than more experienced teachers, this is true of both new visiting profs and new t-t profs–it is not endemic to visiting professors generally. It is a real shame that Whitman is choosing to hire contingent labor rather than tenure-track faculty, but this is a problem with Whitman and the academic system–not a problem with the visiting faculty itself. I’ve been visiting at Whitman for a couple of years now and, frankly, I think I do a pretty good job!

    Reply